advances.in/psychology implements a transparent (open) double-blind peer review process. After editorial review, each paper undergoes evaluation by two reviewers—ideally, one specialized in the field of the submission and the other from a different field. This ensures that successful submissions not only advance the state of the art but also remain relevant and accessible to a wider audience. In some cases of submissions on highly specialized topics, one reviewer and an editor specialized in the paper’s topic may be asked to evaluate the paper.
In the spirit of transparency, the anonymous reviews are published as a report alongside the accepted article. We primarily rely on the evaluations provided by our editorial board members and external reviewers. Occasionally, we may also request reviewer recommendations from authors.
The decision to publish a manuscript rests with the editor, who carefully considers the evaluations provided by the reviewers before making a determination.