Advances in Psychology Logo Advances in Psychology Logo
Research Article

“(The story of) This country is ours!” The territorial and epistemic dimensions of collective psychological ownership among the national majority and immigrants

Zea Szebeni ORCID, Reko Elovainio ORCID, Borja Martinović ORCID, Tom Nijs ORCID, & Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti ORCID
https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00035
Published: May 29, 2025
Copyright: The authors (CC BY 4.0)

Szebeni, Z., Elovainio, R., Martinović, B., Nijs, T., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2025). “(The story of) This country is ours!” The territorial and epistemic dimensions of collective psychological ownership among the national majority and immigrants. advances.in/psychology, 2, e753124. https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00035

Szebeni, Zea, et al. "“(The story of) This country is ours!” The territorial and epistemic dimensions of collective psychological ownership among the national majority and immigrants." advances.in/psychology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2025, e753124. https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00035.

Szebeni, Zea, Reko Elovainio, Borja Martinović, Tom Nijs, and Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti. 2025. "“(The story of) This country is ours!” The territorial and epistemic dimensions of collective psychological ownership among the national majority and immigrants." advances.in/psychology 2 (1): e753124. https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00035.

Szebeni Z, Elovainio R, Martinović B, Nijs T, Jasinskaja-Lahti I. “(The story of) This country is ours!” The territorial and epistemic dimensions of collective psychological ownership among the national majority and immigrants. advances.in/psychology. 2025;2(1):e753124. doi:10.56296/aip00035.

Szebeni, Z. et al. (2025) '“(The story of) This country is ours!” The territorial and epistemic dimensions of collective psychological ownership among the national majority and immigrants', advances.in/psychology, 2(1), e753124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56296/aip00035.

Download .RIS Download .bib
This study examines collective psychological ownership (CPO) of a country on two dimensions: territorial ownership (CPO-T)—the traditional conceptualisation of CPO as ownership over physical land and borders—and our newly introduced term, epistemic ownership (CPO-E)—ownership over national narratives and symbolic borders. Using a quota-representative sample of ethnic majority Finns (n = 1000) and panel data from second-generation immigrants (n = 1239) in Finland, we examined how these dimensions manifest across groups, which arguments allow ownership claims, and how ownership claims are related to perceived determination of rights and responsibilities towards Finland. Results confirmed that CPO-T and CPO-E represent distinct dimensions. Collective investment was associated with a higher level of ownership across both dimensions and groups. Majority members’ sense of ownership was also associated with higher levels of intimate knowledge, while control was associated with a higher level of perceived ownership within the minority population. For majority Finns, CPO-T was associated with perceived exclusive rights, whereas CPO-E was associated with collective responsibility. Among second-generation immigrants, both dimensions were associated with perceived rights, but not responsibility. These findings demonstrate that understanding country ownership requires examining both territorial and epistemic dimensions whereby they serve different functions for majority and migrant groups’ claims of belonging.
  • Zea Szebeni, Inga Jasinskaja‐Lahti, Reko Elovainio, Borja Martinović (2025). Collective psychological ownership and welfare chauvinism: exploring double standards in Finnish immigration attitudes / <i>Propiedad psicológica colectiva y chovinismo del bienestar: explorando los dobles estándares en las actitudes hacia la inmigración en Finlandia</i>. International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social. https://doi.org/10.1177/02134748251377992
Download PDF Back to article